Bitcoin: Financial alternatives or a statement of distrust in Banks?

Perhaps it depends on an individual's exact need and their perception on world currency. Since its introduction in 2009, the Bitcoin seems to have gain traction and is accepted in trade by merchants and individuals in many parts of the world. Like other currencies, Bitcoin is virtual currency with certain or particular transactions that constitute some of its commercial usage.

 Most recently the Bitcoin has gained favorable attention with the Winklevoss twins, which has been reviewed by several financial journalists and economists to mixed-acclaim and or wowed/damned by public opinions. However, if the private Bitcoin exchanges and investment companies take off, this would advance the attention of regulators as they already have a tense relationship with the Bitcoin Foundation. The concept of Crowdfunding peer-to-peer has taken on a business trend as they began to compete with banks' small business loans. Could this be the wisdom of the few that acknowledged signals of warnings and have a willingness to support an alternative finance systems? Ericsson Announces Open Money: Files Bitcoin Patent Application for the "Good of Society" -->

 If you're merchant within the business world, or not, you may like to subside discriminating/favorable opinions of others and investigate trendy financial alternatives / Bitcoins and Cryptocurrency--- Does it concern Your future or Not. As the true/realistic answer will always apply to an individual's own preference.

An Bloomberg interview on the Bitcoin Boom, as they explore the current state and potential of bitcoins as currency. Agenda on July 30th. 2013 in NYC, Bitcoins speakers will delve deeper into this topic and explore emerging business opportunities. 


Political correctness can often refer to as catering or following opinionated thoughts and actions of others as a majority. However, history has proven that such names as Jobs, Ayn Rand, Gates, Buffet, Hughes, Tucker and a few handful of other extraordinary minds, has help shape society in ways that the average person of the majority may never realize or understand. Trailblazers are visionaries with cadence that lead instead of follow.


 Contrary to popularity of Facebook's origin; the court majority awarded the victor as  'sole-founder' [Facebook] . Can one oppose to the few/minority who acknowledged the fact that without such names as Saverin, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss and Narendra, Facebook would not be the social network giant that it is today? Did the "majority" ruled and missed the point? 

 Was it not the Winklevoss and Narendra (the originators)  idea/concept, and Saverin's finances that help brainstormed & catapulted  "The Facebook"? The Winklevoss twins may or may not be on to something, but one thought is sure-- do they have an insight as to a verge in monetary change of world currency? Tease and Joke as some people have. The hidden maze & misdirections are not for the simple minded, dare not ignore the financial moves and investments of the Winklevoss twins-- It [ may or not] be worth the steal! 


“Love should be treated like a business deal, but every business deal has its own terms and its own currency. And in love, the currency is virtue. You love people not for what you do for them or what they do for you. You love them for the values, the virtues, which they have achieved in their own character.” ― Ayn Rand


                  Po'boy! An Online Network Presentation. Thanks for Visiting!!!